Signup
LoginRecent Posts by brokenluv
-
-
liverpool played well. period. chelsea got impatient towards the end.period.
noob TS dono how to watch football? gerrards tackle i feel was legitimate( which he got a card for it ). chelsea themselves did a few bad tackles as well. pls look at your own team or even look at urself in the mirror and repent lah. come in and kpkb about kelongness? if u think u can play better than those pros on the field den go out and prove yourself bitch
-
-
-
Originally posted by Agenda:
You notice, this season LFC's goals came from where the wingers cut in deep before passing off precise cross rather than from outside anyhow whack?
Benitez needs to take note of that.
But we did good, even after 2 goals down, they didn't give up and Torres, almost invisible in the game suddenly posed his presence with a 2 goals brace.
what i have been noticing about torres is that he really is in off-form, but still can finish and score goals.
-
-
-
There is a huge gap between the big four and the rest of the epl teams, i dont think there will be any break thru into the top4 anywhere in the near future. My huge gap refers to the quality of play and ability to play possesion football. If you look at liverpool or chelsea, even tho they cant play very attractive football they can hold the ball pretty good, and theres the difference btwn a top4 club and the rest of the pack
Sure everton may become rich, but if you look at the quality of the current pack of players there, i dont think instant riches can buy them champions league any sooner.
On the other hand, i think man city already has the potential to play good football. b4 the foreign owners came in, they have a great youth academy and some really decent players such as micah richards, richard dunne and stephen ireland.
-
-
-
http://www.sexdrivethemovie.com/
Watched the trailers and i think its a pretty good movie
-
-
-
Originally posted by NG QIBO AARON AUBREY:
we lost because we fielded our reserves against pool
how can you say man united fielded their reserves, kind of implying that they have a weak 2nd team. Which part of that day's lineup is ''reserve''? Honestly i thought pool were gonna get thrashed when tevez scored that 1st goal early on. I think you should give some credit to pool for playing well that day.
-
-
-
Originally posted by weiz87:
i would say that manchester united and chelsea 2nd team will be better den liverpool 1st team =) mayb only torres. but lampard is still around.
what? liverpool got one of the best midfield around - gerrard, alonso, masherano, i believe its better than man u's trio of scholes, anderson and hargreaves
-
-
-
Originally posted by limpper:
weakened? so man utd relies on 1 person to see if can win a match anot? doesnt mean ronaldo down, man utd down. liverpool played united without torres and gerrard coming on in the 2nd half also. but none of liverpool fan conplained about the missing of torres, why are you complaining the absence of a star when your team is considered a european champion? a real champ should be able to play anyone at any time, all really to win.
true, gerrard and torres may be liverpool's current icon but nobody is bigger than the club. But look at ronaldo.
-
